Stu
Regular Pride Poster
Posts: 223
|
Post by Stu on Feb 13, 2011 20:37:16 GMT -5
Basically we've finally found a structure to the show, but we're missing just one thing and we can't really think of how to do it.
Basically as you'll probably know by now this is how the Botchcast works.
Part A
Banter
Main talking points surrounding our circle which could include, an e-fed talking points, promoting something, scandal, returns, people leaving, all that kind of stuff.
Part B
E-Fed Trivia quiz Questions E-Fedder spotlight (New feature.) Cris moment of the week.
Now we've decided to do away with predictions as they're pretty boring and majority play the predictions on the boards anyway. Now what we need to cooperate into the Botchcast is character stuff, storylines and what not. But we're struggling to find an interesting way to do this without it being boring and dull. We've tried to do it before but it just came across lame. It's hard because we can't really give opinions on storylines as in 'where they should go', 'where we expect them to go' and what not. Because unlike real wrestling where people win or lose for storylines to make sense, e-feds not like that as it's not predetermined. In the past when we have done it, I found we were just re reading what actually happened on the shows which you all know what happened anyway; so we were just repeating.
Maybe there is a way to do it to make it sound interesting, and if you have an idea? feel free to give us your opinions on how it could work.
|
|
|
Post by Trav McBang! on Feb 13, 2011 20:38:05 GMT -5
Speak American.
|
|
Stu
Regular Pride Poster
Posts: 223
|
Post by Stu on Feb 13, 2011 20:40:13 GMT -5
We had you on at one point and you were probably the hardest to understand out the lot of us >_>
|
|
|
Post by Kid Flanagan on Feb 13, 2011 20:42:21 GMT -5
A moment on the show could be dedicated to Cris telling the viewers what storylines he would use for a certain feuds....
|
|
|
Post by Chris Williams on Feb 13, 2011 21:26:25 GMT -5
Honestly, I think a piece about where you think feuds could be going or what you'd like to see from a feud would be a great piece. Also, possibly point out what feud is capturing your attention moreso than some others, and why. It'd be a great insight, imo
|
|
|
Post by Kirk Noble on Feb 15, 2011 22:51:06 GMT -5
Over in UWL, Jack had a good point about trivia. Probably not going to last all that long, ha.
I don't know that discussing angles is all that interesting. I mean, it's nice to read about, but half an hour discussion about one that may not involve you doesn't sound like the most interesting thing in the world. I generally have them on the background while I do homework, so if I hear about an angle in UWL that I'm not familiar with, I may not really listen.
While it's kind of already covered in the first part, I think controversial discussions are going to get you listeners (tactful, mind you). That's how all the daytime talk shows hosts get listeners (Not that I've ever watched one >_>)
Actually going into detail about things like...
- Ethics in e-feds. - Sandbagging - OOC disputes - Good/bad traits of fedders - Good/bad traits of fed heads - How much public information is in feds
They don't need to be specific discussions about our circle, just general overview topics, with references to our circle. Like, if you're talking about traits of fed heads, you can talk about general traits, and occasionallyyou can talk about things you have/haven't liked about Me, Jeremy, JJ, Jim, Rob, Nick, etc.
If you can get people, try. New people on the show would help out. Heck, if I can get a reliable microphone, I may do a show with you for kicks.
Just my thoughts.
|
|